<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You Don&#8217;t Need a Blog to Have a Blog Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nowisgone.com/2008/04/01/you-dont-need-a-blog-to-have-a-blog-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nowisgone.com/2008/04/01/you-dont-need-a-blog-to-have-a-blog-policy/</link>
	<description>A Primer on New Media for Executives and Entrepreneurs</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 03:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Jazz</title>
		<link>http://nowisgone.com/2008/04/01/you-dont-need-a-blog-to-have-a-blog-policy/#comment-1396</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Jazz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 23:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowisgone.com/2008/04/01/you-dont-need-a-blog-to-have-a-blog-policy/#comment-1396</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ike.

For the sake of your readers, I'll respond here, but also follow up over email.

The question of "What if I were outed tomorrow?" is a constant thought.  I intentionally distance (read: fudge) my posts from my job.  While I have posted on events that we've been part of, I make sure to only quote and take inspiration from publicly available documents.

My situation is, of course, different than our Patent Troll Hunter friend, as you said, because of the effects of his posts.  My posts are almost always couched in the desire to improve public health preparedness and homeland security.  To that end, pointing out flaws is little more than a step in the process.

It's kind of frustrating, though, to have most of my online persona devoted to transparency and open access--while posting as pseudonymously.  I do feel like I'm shortchanging my readers and de-valuing my message.  I hope to one day broach this subject with our Communications Director, and having an official blog policy would be a great way to start that conversation. 

Thanks again, and I'll have an email out to you later tonight sometime.

-Jimmy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ike.</p>
<p>For the sake of your readers, I&#8217;ll respond here, but also follow up over email.</p>
<p>The question of &#8220;What if I were outed tomorrow?&#8221; is a constant thought.  I intentionally distance (read: fudge) my posts from my job.  While I have posted on events that we&#8217;ve been part of, I make sure to only quote and take inspiration from publicly available documents.</p>
<p>My situation is, of course, different than our Patent Troll Hunter friend, as you said, because of the effects of his posts.  My posts are almost always couched in the desire to improve public health preparedness and homeland security.  To that end, pointing out flaws is little more than a step in the process.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s kind of frustrating, though, to have most of my online persona devoted to transparency and open access&#8211;while posting as pseudonymously.  I do feel like I&#8217;m shortchanging my readers and de-valuing my message.  I hope to one day broach this subject with our Communications Director, and having an official blog policy would be a great way to start that conversation. </p>
<p>Thanks again, and I&#8217;ll have an email out to you later tonight sometime.</p>
<p>-Jimmy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ike Pigott</title>
		<link>http://nowisgone.com/2008/04/01/you-dont-need-a-blog-to-have-a-blog-policy/#comment-1395</link>
		<dc:creator>Ike Pigott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowisgone.com/2008/04/01/you-dont-need-a-blog-to-have-a-blog-policy/#comment-1395</guid>
		<description>Hey Jimmy...

I prescribe "artificial sunlight."  By that, I mean look at what you write through the lens of "What if I were outed tomorrow?"  If you're still publishing material that won't get you or your employer, then you are most likely okay.

The problem Cisco faces is that the Patent Troll Hunter had made and supported many statements that would end up tilting opinion in Cisco's favor.  In retrospect, it might be argued he was advancing a corporate agenda, and as such, the company might be liable for some of the claims he made (like accusing lawyers of backdating documents, a big no-no.)

With no clear policy in place, your employer is allowing far too many gray areas.  Those are more their concern than yours.

Shoot me an email -- I actually know a guy that might have some advice for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jimmy&#8230;</p>
<p>I prescribe &#8220;artificial sunlight.&#8221;  By that, I mean look at what you write through the lens of &#8220;What if I were outed tomorrow?&#8221;  If you&#8217;re still publishing material that won&#8217;t get you or your employer, then you are most likely okay.</p>
<p>The problem Cisco faces is that the Patent Troll Hunter had made and supported many statements that would end up tilting opinion in Cisco&#8217;s favor.  In retrospect, it might be argued he was advancing a corporate agenda, and as such, the company might be liable for some of the claims he made (like accusing lawyers of backdating documents, a big no-no.)</p>
<p>With no clear policy in place, your employer is allowing far too many gray areas.  Those are more their concern than yours.</p>
<p>Shoot me an email &#8212; I actually know a guy that might have some advice for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Jazz</title>
		<link>http://nowisgone.com/2008/04/01/you-dont-need-a-blog-to-have-a-blog-policy/#comment-1393</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Jazz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 20:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowisgone.com/2008/04/01/you-dont-need-a-blog-to-have-a-blog-policy/#comment-1393</guid>
		<description>Ike:

What about the other side of the coin?  What about the pseudonymous public health preparedness blogger who wants to protect his employer even as he realizes that his employer will never take the time to craft a blog policy?

Anything a person in that particular situation could do to protect both himself and his employer?  Do the links deal with this situation?  Maybe some sort of a disclosure statement?

Keep up the good work,
Jimmy

PS.  I'm watching you on Twitter, and the fun you're having is infectious.  I might pop into the conversation someday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ike:</p>
<p>What about the other side of the coin?  What about the pseudonymous public health preparedness blogger who wants to protect his employer even as he realizes that his employer will never take the time to craft a blog policy?</p>
<p>Anything a person in that particular situation could do to protect both himself and his employer?  Do the links deal with this situation?  Maybe some sort of a disclosure statement?</p>
<p>Keep up the good work,<br />
Jimmy</p>
<p>PS.  I&#8217;m watching you on Twitter, and the fun you&#8217;re having is infectious.  I might pop into the conversation someday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
